On the other hand, it should be considered that MeNP biosynthesis starts in healthy cells, which then rapidly undergo a progressive alteration until they are completely disrupted due to Ag toxicity. Thus, it could be that MeNP biosynthesis is initiated within the chloroplasts in a healthy cell and ends in the cytoplasm of the same cell, which has been damaged. Conclusions The synthesis of AgNPs in living plants was confirmed in B. juncea and M. sativa and demonstrated for the first time in F. rubra. We assessed the subcellular localization of AgNPs in the plant fractions demonstrating that AgNPs had a similar distribution SB-715992 molecular weight but different sizes. Regarding promotion agents, the presence of AgNPs within the

chloroplasts suggested that primary sugars, at least in the beginning phase, could have a role in the in vivo synthesis of AgNPs. However, while the effects of these substances are usually studied individually, it is very unlikely that they have an exclusive role. On the contrary, given the complexity of plant metabolism, it is most likely that there are synergistic effects between

different substances. We did not verify a clear quantitative relationship between the amount of GLU, FRU, AA and PP and the quantity of AgNPs formed. To evaluate if plants can be efficiently exploited for their ability to synthesize in vivo MeNPs, further experiments are needed not only to define more precisely the mechanism of metal nanoparticle formation in living plants but also to better understand if differences in plant behaviour, due to molecular Tobramycin selleck chemicals mechanisms, result in differences in the amount, forms, dimensions and 3-D structures of the in vivo synthesized

MeNPs. Acknowledgements The authors thank Dr. Laurence Cantrill (Out of Site English, Sydney) for the English revision. References 1. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Veliparib in vitro Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, Mahendra S, McLaughlin MJ, Lead JR: Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008, 27:1825–1851.CrossRef 2. Hernandez-Viezcas JA, Castillo-Michel H, Andrews JC, Cotte M, Rico C, Peralta-Videa JR, Ge Y, Priester JH, Holden PA, Gardea-Torresdey JL: Mapping and speciation of CeO 2 and ZnO nanoparticles in soil cultivated soybean ( Glycine max ). ACS Nano 2013, 7:1415–1423.CrossRef 3. Kawazoe Y, Meech JA: Welcome to IPPM’03—nanotechnology: do good things really come in small packages? In Intelligence in a Small Materials World. Edited by: Meech J, Kawazoe Y, Kumar V, Maguire JF. Lancaster: DSEtech; 2005:3–11. 4. Kowshik M, Ashataputre S, Kharrazi S, Kulkarni SK, Paknikar KM, Vogel W, Urban J: Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles by a silver-tolerant yeast strain MKY3. Nanotechnology 2003, 14:95–100.CrossRef 5. Mohanpuria P, Rana KN, Yadav SK: Biosynthesis of nanoparticles: technological concepts and future applications. J Nanopart Res 2008, 10:507–517.CrossRef 6.