This ligation mixture was used as a template for PCR amplificatio

This ligation mixture was used as a template for PCR amplification using mini-transposon specific primers. The PCR products obtained were purified with a PCR purification www.selleckchem.com/products/Nutlin-3.html kit (Qiagen) and sequenced on an Applied Biosystems ABI prism 3130×l capillary sequencer. The resulting sequences were compared to the H. arsenicoxydans genome sequence [6] to identify disrupted CDS. Finally, insertion sites and transposon orientations were precisely mapped by sequencing PCR products obtained with two primers hybridizing upstream and downstream, respectively, of the insertion

site of each disrupted gene (see Additional file 2, Table S2). Arsenic speciation determination H. arsenicoxydans wild type and mutants were grown for 48 hours in CDM medium supplemented with 1.33 mM As(III). Culture supernatants were filtered through sterile 0,22 μm pore size filters (VWR). Arsenic species were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and quantified by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), as previously described [9]. RNA extraction Strains were grown at 25°C for 24 h (OD = 0,15) and cultures were induced by addition of 0.66 mM or 1.33 mM As(III) for 8 hours click here before extraction. Samples were harvested and stored at -80°C. RNA was extracted as previously described [7]. After extraction procedure, RNA integrity

was checked by electrophoregram analysis on a BioAnalyser (Agilent) and total RNA concentration was determined

spectrophotometrically with a Nanodrop. Microarrays and data https://www.selleckchem.com/products/idasanutlin-rg-7388.html analysis Microarrays containing 60-mer oligonucleotides for all predicted H. arsenicoxydans genes http://​www.​genoscope.​cns.​fr/​agc/​mage/​arsenoscope were used, as previously described [7]. Briefly, total RNA (5 μg) was reverse transcribed and indirectly labelled according to manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications [7]. The quality and concentration Immune system determination as well as hybridization and scanning were performed as previously described [7] Three distinct biological RNA samples were prepared from in each growth condition (with and without As(III) induction) and labelled either by Cy3 or Cy5 in a dye-swap design. Microarray data were deposited in ArrayExpress (accession E-MEXP-2199 and A-MEXP-1594). Data normalization and statistical analysis were performed as previously described [7]. Briefly, data were acquired and analyzed by Genepix Pro 6.0 (Axon Instrument). The experiment design included three biological replicates. For each of them, induced and non-induced cells were compared in dye swap experiments. The resulting arrays were analyzed using the R software http://​www.​r-project.​org. A slide by slide Loess normalization was performed using the limma package [49]. Valid log2 expression ratios from replicated spots were averaged on each array so as to get statistically independent ratios for each oligonucleotide included in the array design.

Comments are closed.