The teams had five months to deliver the IAT systems to the UAG for assessment. In the ZD6474 end, all systems provided an interface to enter a PMCID or gene name ID to retrieve a full length article or article list, respectively, with the exception of MyMi ner, which was originally designed for other purposes, but it was of particu lar interest to determine how suitable this system was under the BioCreative IAT task settings and to under stand which features were important to the IAT users. Table 3 provides an overview of the major features of each participating system. For a more detailed descrip tion see the Methods section below. Assessment of IAT systems To assess the different systems, the UAG prepared a questionnaire related to the interface usability and per formance.
A subset of UAG members conducted the assessment, which was done remotely. The results were collected, compared to the manually annotated set and described Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries during the BC III workshop. Since this was a demonstration task, not a competition, the results pre sented are preliminary and only a guide to evaluate fea sibility of a future interactive challenge. Assessing usability As you operated the system interface, did the overall organization of the web pages appeal to you Figure 1A, question 1 shows that overall organization appealed to most curators. What aspects features about the interface appealed to you the most Three aspects were of common appeal Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries to users, 1 intuitive navigation, 2 highlighting, and 3 easy access to databases, such as UniProt, Entrez Gene and PMC.
What aspects features would you like to see added to this interface Two important features identified from this question were user validation, and highlighting related gene mentions and species to provide gene species assertion evidence in the context of the full text article. 4. List any aspects features that did not appeal to you. The most common unappealing Carfilzomib aspect was species bias, which leads to inaccurate normalization, so for example in the cases analyzed, the Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries system would link a gene mention most often to some mammalian species even when the article did not deal with these organism at all. But even worse was the case where the systems excluded some species alto gether, so it would not be possible to link the gene to its correct identifier using the given system. Assessing Performance 5.
Did the system help you with the gene normalization task Users found that when systems correctly linked a gene mention to the corresponding database identifier, it sped up the curation process. Articles with challen ging normalization examples reduced user satisfaction, Figure Inhibitors,Modulators,Libraries 1B, Q5 shows the wide range of the selleck products responses. 6. Is the gene ranking correct As with question 5, in some cases the gene ranking was correct, i. e.