The occlusion was adjusted to present solid interdigitation, canine guidance, and consistent and regular occlusal contacts. After delivery of the definitive restorations, harmonious vertical facial relations were achieved with a satisfactory nose/lip/chin relationship (Fig 10). A class I relationship was obtained. The patient was extremely satisfied with the treatment outcome. The patient received instructions on meticulous oral hygiene care. A strict 6-month recall regimen was maintained. To date, the patient has worn the prosthesis for 5
years and reported no complications (Figs 11, 12). This clinical report presents the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with CCD after orthodontic treatment. The treatment of dental abnormalities associated with CCD often requires PARP activity multidisciplinary approaches with a combination of orthodontics, prosthodontics, and
orthognathic surgical interventions. Despite orthodontic treatment, this patient presented a deficient lower facial height and unsatisfactory facial appearance because the underlying skeletal deformity had not been solved. In treating this patient with decreased OVD, standard phonetic and esthetic criteria were evaluated to determine the appropriate OVD.[7, 17-21] The patient’s ability to adapt to the increa-sed OVD was verified by an interim overdenture. AZD1208 mw The patient did not show any negative consequences to the increased OVD. A maxillary overdenture covering the natural teeth could be a treatment option in this case. The advantages of overdentures compared with fixed prostheses include preservation of tooth structure and relatively low cost; however, there are disadvantages of overdentures as well. Caries tend to frequently occur because supporting teeth are isolated
Quinapyramine from normal salivary contact by the overdenture. Occlusal wear of the overdenture can be a problem after long-term use. Here, the patient preferred an FDP to an overdenture. Facial esthetics and lip support were satisfactory with the fixed interim prosthesis. Due to the increased OVD, the crown-to-root ratio was compromised for the fixed prosthesis. No objective criteria are yet identified to define the need for splinting in relation to violating the crown-to-root ratio. However, splinting the maxillary teeth was considered to achieve stabilization against occlusal force. Splinting abutments may enhance stability and may significantly distribute horizontal forces. A telescopic prosthesis was determined to be the treatment option. Inner telescopic copings were permanently cemented individually to the maxillary teeth, and then a detachable telescopic prosthesis (the superstructure) was cemented with provisional cement. Although this prosthesis requires complex laboratory procedures, there are many advantages.[24-27] The primary advantage of a telescopic prosthesis is retrievability.