The amount of missing data across all measures was 3.6% for those taking part in wave 5, although if complete-case analyses were carried out 42% of respondents would show some missing data. Multiple Imputation (MI) was therefore used to address potential biases arising from missing values. Complete-case sensitivity analysis was also carried out, but the results mirrored the substantive findings of the MI analyses (presented here). Thirty-five imputed datasets were created, and analyses were performed using the ‘ice’ and ‘mibeta’ packages in Stata

(ver.11, Stata Corp., Texas, USA). Auxiliary variables (those not included in the analysis, but which help predict missingness) were included in the imputation model and included self-rated health (W1 & W5), years spent in full-time education (W5), self-assessed disability (W1), self-assessed this website fitness (W1) and religion (W1). All analyses were adjusted for clustered sampling at baseline and were weighted to the living baseline sample at the time of the W5 interviews using inverse probability weights to correct for bias due to drop out (Seaman and Benzeval, 2011). These learn more weights were also included in the imputation model. Linear regression was used for the statistical analyses using

a path analysis approach. First, a basic model, including sex, was used to determine the association between SEP and allostatic load, with a negative regression coefficient representing

lower allostatic load being associated with higher SEP. This basic model was built on by performing further regression analyses including each individual mediator grouped by mediator type (material, psychological or behavioral) to consider the individual degree of attenuation of each potential pathway on the association. The standardized beta coefficients generated were then used to determine the direct and indirect effects between SEP and allostatic load (as seen in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6) Stata’s ‘mibeta’ command does not allow for the calculation of confidence intervals with standardized coefficients, therefore unstandardized coefficients are also presented, with confidence intervals CHIR-99021 cost and p-values in Table 2. These p-values are applicable to both standardized and unstandardized coefficients. Percentage attenuation was used as an additional inspection tool to assess the impact of each potential mediator on the SEP–allostatic load association and was calculated as: [(Unstandardized regression coefficient for the association between SEP and allostatic load-Unstandardized regression coefficient for the association between SEP and allostatic load after adjustment for mediators)/Unstandardized regression coefficient for the association between SEP and allostatic load after adjustment for mediators]×100%.