Renewal of appointments at the end of the first period of office if provisions for such renewals have been made should be subject to satisfactory appraisal. There should

be no expectation of automatic reappointment and this should be made clear to all members when they are appointed. Possible reasons for termination of membership should be made clear and include the following: a failure to attend a specified number of consecutive meetings; a change in affiliation resulting in a conflict of interests; and a lack of professionalism involving, www.selleckchem.com/products/gsk2656157.html for example, a breach of confidentiality. It is highly recommended that the immunization program and/or Ministry of Health provide new committee members with briefing sessions and/or information packages and orient the members to the terms of reference and

group operating procedures. When a new NITAG is created it may be helpful at least for the first meeting or, in advance of the first meeting or during a pre-meeting session, to allow time and venues for members to become acquainted and discuss processes GDC-0973 molecular weight so that they feel at ease during the committee’s discussions and deliberations. In this regards, provision of information on context, clarification of roles and responsibilities and mutual expectations may be important. Standard operating procedures are required that specify the preparation and circulation of agendas, background documents and information, as well as the conduct of meetings and the process for recording and communicating of the committee’s conclusions and recommendations. The following elements should be decided upon and made clear in the standard operating procedures of the group: • Open versus closed meetings. Combinations of this may occur. For example, formal NITAG deliberations may be open while working group sessions are closed (see thereafter). Open meetings increase transparency and may improve public acceptance but at the same time may make the process less efficient and may inhibit NITAG members from speaking as openly as they otherwise would. When national data are not available, information generated from countries

with similar characteristics can be used. Where sufficient data is not available, the committee should solicit additional data/work 17-DMAG (Alvespimycin) HCl to secure the relevant data. In the absence of data or when data is inadequate, expert options can be used to make recommendations. When data permit, specific rules of evidence can be used to judge the quality of data and make decisions regarding the strength of recommendations [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43] and [44]. A theoretical framework/explicit process for decision making could be developed and go as far as using grading of evidence but very few committees currently have such a structured approach [31] and [45]. • Process for deciding on agenda items and input requested from the committee.