Papers regarding SPA must be viewed in this particular scenario. Search method and results A literature search has been made in find more PubMed and Google Scholar using key words “”single port – single access – single incision AND appendectomy – appendicectomy – appendicitis”", without language limits and excluding pediatric cases. Abstract selection was made on 157 papers, among which no randomized studies were found. 23 studies were pertinent with the review; 7 were pseudo-randomized retrospective
case comparisons with LA (Oxford level of GNS-1480 cost evidence 3b), and the remaining were case series (Oxford Level of evidence 4). The total number of SPA operations published is 589. Authors, years of publication, study designs and results are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 list of studies published to june 30, 2011 regarding SPA Author Year Type of study Cases Complications Operative time (min) Additional trocars used Barbaros [26] 2010 Case series 3 none none Bhatia [2] 2011 Case series 17 none 63 none Budzynski [27] 2011 Case series 2 none 25 y Chiu [15] 2011 Case series 22 none 58 none Cho [28] 2011
Case comparison with LA 23 (vs 20) = = none Chow[29] 2010 Case comparison with LA 40 selleck chemicals llc (vs 33) < (p < 0.05) Chouillard [30] 2010 Case series 41 3 39 none Dapri [14] 2011 Case series 30 5 57 none Feinberg [31] 2011 Case series 25 none 56 none Frutos [32] 2011 Case series 73 none 40 none Hayashi [19] 2010 Case series 1 none none Hong[33] 2009 Case series 31 3 (2 abscess, 1 omphalitis) 41 none Kim [20]
2010 Case series 43 5 61 none Kang[34] 2010 Case comparison Avelestat (AZD9668) with LA in complicated appendicitis 15 = y Lee JA [35] 2010 Case comparison with LA 35 (vs 37) 3 (2 wound infections, 1 abscess) 76 none Lee YS [36] 2009 Case comparison with LA 72 (vs 108) 6 41 Nguyen [37] 2009 Case series 1 none 40 none Raakow [38] 2011 Case comparison with LA 20 (vs 20) none 48 none Saber [39] 2010 Case series 26 1 (omphalitis) 46 y Roberts [40] 2009 Case series 13 none 87 none Teoh [16] 2011 Case comparison with LA 30 (vs 60) 2 (1 abscess, 1 ileus) = Vidal [17] 2011 Case series suprapubic approach 20 none 40 none Yu [41] 2011 Case series suprapubic approach 6 none 48 none Total 589 28 (4.8%) 51 Discussion Clinical evidence and consensus development conferences have stated, so far, some evidence regarding the advantages of LA when compared to open appendectomy (OA)[3, 4]. First of all, an utmost importance is given to patients’ selection; in fact, grade A recommendation is advocated only for fertile women. The advantages in the remaining age/gender groups (elderly, men, obese, pregnant) are not so clear. Even in the case of complicated appendicitis (i.e.