Pair wise comparisons were carried out by Dunn’s method

to account for unequal group sizes. A two-way anova was performed to assess differences between the EX 527 manufacturer routes of challenge regarding MMCP-1, while Fisher exact tests were used to address this regarding anaphylaxis. Results were pooled for subsequent analyses when no differences between i.p. and p.o. challenge or interactions could be found. In the lupin model, close to 70% of sensitized mice challenged with lupin developed reactions with a score of 2 or higher (Table 2). Challenged with peanut, soy or fenugreek 37.5%, 31.5% and 12.5% of the lupin-sensitized mice developed serious anaphylaxis (score 2 or higher), respectively. Twenty-five percent of the fenugreek challenged mice Panobinostat purchase did not react, while

all sensitized mice challenged with peanut or soy showed at least a weak reaction with increased itching. All sensitized groups showed significantly higher anaphylactic score compared to control groups (P < 0.001), and the lupin challenged mice showed significantly stronger reactions than mice challenged with soy (P = 0.004), peanut (P = 0.01) and fenugreek (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A). I.p. challenge with lupin resulted in more serious reactions than p.o. challenge with lupin, but no differences could be seen regarding route of challenge (i.p. versus p.o.) for the cross-allergens (peanut, soy and fenugreek). In the fenugreek model, all sensitized mice challenged with fenugreek developed serious anaphylactic reactions of score 2 or higher (Table 2). Mice challenged with fenugreek i.p. developed more serious reactions than mice challenged with fenugreek p.o. Challenged with peanut or soy about 30% of the fenugreek-sensitized mice developed serious reactions, while 75% of lupin challenged mice reacted with a score of 2 or more. Peanut and soy challenges did not result ID-8 in any clinical reaction in 37.5% and 31.25% of the mice, respectively, while all

mice except one reacted to lupin. All sensitized groups showed significantly higher anaphylactic score than control groups (P < 0.001 for fenugreek, i.p. and p.o., and lupin; P = 0.02 for soy and peanut), and the fenugreek challenged mice showed significantly stronger reactions than mice challenged with lupin, soy or peanut (P ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 1C). MMCP-1 was measured as a reflection on the local anaphylactic reaction in the gut, as it is released from mast cells upon activation. Sensitized mice challenged i.p. with the primary antigen responded with a MMCP-1 level much higher than all other groups in both models, including mice challenged p.o. with the primary allergen (Fig. 1B,D). In contrast, mice challenged p.o. with lupin in the lupin model (Fig. 1B) had higher MMCP-1 levels than the other groups, while mice challenged (both p.o. and i.p.) with peanut, soy or fenugreek as well as only immunized mice (not challenged) all had significantly higher levels than control mice.