In this situation, event-based approaches represent a promising research line to develop new control strategies where the exchange of information among control agents is produced by the triggering of specific events and not by the passing of time.Another reason why event-based control is interesting is that it closer in nature to the way a human behaves as a controller. The final reason to research in event-based control is computing and communication resource utilization, that is, the reduction of the data exchange between sensors, controllers, and actuators. This reduction of information is equivalent to extend the lifetime of battery-powered wireless sensors, to reduce the computational load in embedded devices, or to reduce the network bandwidth.

Why is it then that time-triggered control still dominates? A major reason is the great difficulty involved with developing a system theory for event based control systems. Until now, most of the research lines in event-based control have tried to adapt time-based control approaches to the event-based paradigm, producing systems where time-based and event-based elements are all living together in the control loop [18]. Other developments have tried to devise pure event-based control approaches with a total lack of synchronism or sharing of clock signals among sensors, controllers, and actuators [19,20]; in this research line the control agents are always activated by specific events and it is where most difficulties emerge to produce theoretical developments to back the experimental results.

The work presented in this paper corresponds to the second category: an experimental study of pure event-based approaches.As it was said at the beginning, until now the majority of the published work in automatic control considers time-based control systems as the only paradigm to implement automatic control systems. However, when Batimastat taking a quick look at human behavior, it is clear that the triggering of events is the strategy we use to apply feedback control in many facets of everyday life.

For example, in a traffic jam drivers hold the safety distance among cars by braking or speeding up, but drivers do not have Brefeldin_A precision clocks to signal when they have to observe the distance with the car in front of them; they are observing the back of the next car and when a driver subjectively considers that the safety distance is short enough s/he sends a new control action to the car – to brake -; and if the distance is long enough, then the control action is to speed-up. Another similar event-based control strategy is used every morning when we are trying to regulate by hand the water temperature when we take a shower.