Hence we need communication between all the stakeholders and

especially to achieve the vertical and horizontal integration mentioned above. We need to communicate our science and the projected results of the management to allow better decision-making; for example, DNA Damage inhibitor we have to warn that excess nutrients entering water bodies may give the benefits of cheaper food but also the costs to recreational areas and shellfisheries because of toxic and nuisance algal blooms. The 10-tenets shows the need for a multidisciplinary approach to marine management but it may also require some disciplines to move out of their comfort zone. For example, pure natural scientists may dislike having their science framed against a background of socio-economic and political science but this is the reality of the modern world (note that 9 of the 10 relate to society!). Most importantly we need a system in which both natural and social scientists and policy makers be educated to act

across that multidisciplinary framework. learn more The 10-tenets framework has been developed over several years and it still requires further work, not least to determine whether these 10-tenets should be ranked or weighted in some way. Of course this raises a set of questions which need to be tackled together with the framework for navigating a path through marine management (Box 2). This may be regarded as taking pentoxifylline an overly anthropocentric view but, as mentioned above, the aim is to manage people and their actions rather than (or as a way to managing) the marine environment. As shown here we need clear objectives in fulfilling The Ecosystem Approach

in order to get ‘triple wins’ for ecology, society and economy. We can determine the footprint of marine activities and then address/solve/mitigate/compensate the problems but we should not assume activities automatically lead to pressures and in turn to impacts as this negates the value of mitigation and compensation. The 10-tenets emphasise the role of economics but we see that good business relies on good ecology/biology/husbandry. The essence to good management is connectivity in the natural and societal aspects – for good water conditions, ecological well-being, and the seas being fit-for-purpose. We need vertical and horizontal integration, across sectors and states with harmonised governance and feedback mechanisms. We need to agree future scenarios and manage to moving baselines and link monitoring/modelling/management in adaptive and complex systems (Gregory et al., 2013). This results from having to accommodate problems within and outside the systems being managed, what we term exogenic unmanaged pressures and endogenic managed pressures (see Elliott, 2011 and Atkins et al., 2011) in order to achieve ecological and socio-economic carrying capacity.