For example, when investigating floor layers’ task module laying

For example, when investigating floor layers’ task module laying carpet, we were measuring the VX-661 mw single tasks application of glue and laying carpet in the morning, and he reported

all tasks and breaks happening in the afternoon (Table 1). By combining the information from the diary with the actually measured data that could be copied to cover all respective task periods, a reconstruction of the work shift was developed (Table 1, last column). Table 1 Example of a diary and measuring schedule of a floor layer with two measuring samples used for reconstruction of a whole shift (task module: laying carpet; M1 and M2 = measurement samples) Time Task (derived from the diary) Measurement Kneeling/squatting Reconstruction 07.00–07.30 Staurosporine cost AZD1152 Approach (driving)   – Non relevant 07.30–08.00 Preparation of worksite   – Non relevant 08.00–08.30 Application of glue M1 × M1 08.30–10.30 Laying carpet M2 × M2 10.30–11.00 Application of glue   × M1 copy 11.00–12.30 Laying carpet   × M2 copy 12.30–13.00 Break   – Break 13.00–13.30 Preparation work   – Non relevant 13.30–14.00 Application of glue   × M1 copy 14.00–15.30 Laying carpet

  × M2 copy 15.30–16.00 Clearing of worksite   – Non relevant Non relevant = none of the defined knee-straining postures occurred As a result, the reconstructed work shift could consist of four different time periods: single tasks accompanied by original measurements, single tasks with time-related copies of measurement data, non relevant parts (i.e. concomitant activities), and breaks. The median duration of the original measurements per work shift was 2.2 h (0.5–7.7 h), and 530 h in total were used for analysis. Pretest The accuracy of the CUELA system and the sensors used in the system

has been validated in earlier studies with a multiple-camera motion analysis system (Ellegast 1998; Schiefer et al. 2011). In addition, the automatic identification of the five knee-straining postures by the analysis software (Fig. 2) was validated by comparing the duration of the single knee-straining activities as derived from the automatic analysis of the measurement data with the video-taped time intervals of knee-straining postures in the first measuring sample enough of every single occupation (n = 16) by one observer (DMD). Validation study To validate the specific method of shift reconstruction performed in this study, a validation study was initiated comparing the “reconstructed” exposure with the results of “total shift measurements”. The test consisted of 14 work shifts (eight service technicians, four ramp agents, and two nursery nurses). In each case, posture capturing with CUELA for an entire work shift of seven to 8 h in total was performed. As a result, we could indicate the time proportions per day spent in the five different knee-straining postures (“measured shift”).

Comments are closed.