For cl

For example, when learning to type with 10 fingers, at the beginning one needs explicit knowledge of the exact keyboard position

of each letter. After getting the routine, this knowledge is gradually lost. On a neurophysiological level, research has shown that attention to motor action entails neuronal activity changes in the premotor cortex, in prefrontal regions, and in mainly the left-parietal cortex (Jueptner et al. 1997; Rushworth et al. 2001; Rowe et al. 2002a,b). Regarding the primary motor cortex, it was observed that during learning of a Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical new task attention to an external focus (button to be pressed) in comparison with an internal focus (moving finger) is associated with higher activity in this Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical brain region (Zentgraf et al. 2009); this finding is paralleled by better task performance (Wulf and Prinz 2001; Wulf et al. 2010). The primary motor cortex is not a homogenous entity but is divided into at least two anatomical, neurochemical, and functional distinct subregions, called 4a for the more anterior, lateral, and superior part and 4p for the more posterior, medial, and inferior part (Zilles et al. 1995; Geyer et al.

1996). Findings in monkeys also point to a dichotomy of the primary motor cortex (Stepniewska et al. 1993). Regarding attention modulation, Binkofski et al. (2002) observed that Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in right-handers, who performed a paced U-shaped movement with their right index finger, area 4p but not 4a was modulated by attention to action: directing attention to the moving finger led to more activity in 4p of the contralateral Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical hemisphere; the regions of interest (ROIs) were defined anatomically. Johansen-Berg and Matthews (2002) investigated right-handers who used their left hand in a paced button press task, and demonstrated that simultaneous distraction by a cognitive task (counting backward) led to a decrease of activity in primary motor cortex of the contralateral hemisphere; this effect was more pronounced in area 4p than 4a, and the ROIs were defined anatomically. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Rodríguez et al. (2004)

showed a decrease of activity in the contralateral primary motor cortex during a phasic finger movement of the dominant hand under distraction; subjects were right- (n = 8) and left-handers (n = 2) and the ROIs were defined functionally. Rowe et al. (2002a) in turn reported no influence of attention, namely concentration on the moving finger, on primary motor cortex when investigating right-handers who did a paced TAK-875 datasheet sequential Clinical Microbiology Reviews finger movement of the right hand; analysis was done on a whole-brain level. It is noteworthy that taken all studies together, only two left-handers were investigated (Rodríguez et al. 2004). In summary, although previous studies suggest that attention can have some influence on primary motor cortex activity, the exact nature of these effects needs to be explored further. Factors like handedness, usage of the dominant versus nondominant hand, type of attention modulation (distraction vs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>