[17, 25] In this study, we found that the LGV diameter increased with the increasing

endoscopic grades of the varices, which suggested that the diameter of LGV or SV could have a potential association with the endoscopic grades of the varices. We confirmed that the diameters of the LGV or SV could be independent risk factors for the presence of esophageal varices, and be used to Cilomilast discriminate the grades of the varices. Based on the present data with the ROC analysis, the LGV and SV diameter measurements could be used as referential criteria to classify the endoscopic grades of esophageal varices except for discriminating grade 1 from 2. This indiscrimination between grade 1 and 2 may be because the endoscopic grading system for the varices used in our study is on the basis of the size and morphology of the largest varix, and the difference in the endoscopic grades between grade 1 and 2 is not so obvious. Patients between grades 0–1

and 2–3, which were defined as low-risk and high-risk varices, respectively, could be discriminated by the LGV and SV diameter measurements. According BMS-907351 manufacturer to the AUC which was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the cut-off diameters in classifying the endoscopic grades of esophageal varices, the cut-off diameter of the LGV was found to be better than that of the SV in classifying grades 0 from 1, grades 0 from 2, and grades 0–1 from 2–3. The potential explanation may be because the SV is not only the predominant originating vein of the LGV but also the originating vein of other shunts such as splenorenal shunt and gastric fundic varices, which may have an affect on the hemodynamics and diameter of the SV.[1, 23] On the other hand, the cut-off diameter of the SV was found to have similar diagnostic performance to that of the LGV in classifying grades 0 from 3, and grades 2 from 3; and

the cut-off diameter of the SV was better in classifying grades 1 from 3. Therefore, recognition of the dilated LGV and SV may be an additional secondary 上海皓元 sign of esophageal varices, and the diameter measurements are crucial to classify endoscopic grades of the varices for guiding the therapy to prevent the potential hemorrhage.[24] However, there was a limitation in this study. The enrolled patients in this study had post-hepatitic cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis B, but our findings are specific to liver cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis B. In conclusion, we used a portography with MR imaging to visualize the inflowing vessel and its originating vein of esophageal varices secondary to liver cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis B. On MR portography, the diameter of the LGV or SV could be associated with the presence and endoscopic grades of the varices, and could be used to discriminate the high-risk varices from the low-risk ones.