The following search terms were used to identify all relevant pub

The following search terms were used to identify all relevant publications: “African American,” “Black,” “breast cancer,” “ovarian cancer,” “genetic risk assessment,” “genetic testing,” “genetic counseling,” and “BRCA.” Selection strategy Eligible studies included either an African American sample or a mixed sample with sub-analyses conducted among African American women. Studies addressing participation in both genetic counseling and testing were included in this review, as both are central to the genetic risk assessment process. Empirical research findings from observational or correlational/descriptive studies,

clinical trials, and longitudinal cohorts were included in this review; reviews, editorials, and commentaries were #Savolitinib research buy randurls[1|1|,|CHEM1|]# excluded. Also excluded were papers that only measured knowledge of genetic counseling and testing among African American woman, as this was extensively reviewed by Halbert et al. (Halbert et al. 2005c). Three authors (K.S., L.-K.S., and K.C.) conducted the search, developed the coding form, and coded the studies; the two other authors (S.M. and S.S.G.) independently reviewed the coded studies. Disagreements among the coders and the reviewers were discussed until agreement was reached among all authors. Results The systematic search yielded 112 studies. Of these, 88 studies were excluded on the basis of their title and/or abstract. Twenty-four

studies were retrieved for a more thorough evaluation, and a further six were excluded for not meeting review eligibility criteria. Eighteen papers remained and were included in check details this review (see Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Selection of included articles Table 1 provides an overview of studies included in this review. Across all studies, there was an average of 98 African American women participants (range, 13 to 266 women; Matthews et al. 2000; Lipkus et al. 1999). Among the prospective studies, three recorded measurements at one time point and assessed subsequent risk assessment participation (Halbert et al. 2005b; Hughes et al. 2003; Thompson

et al. 2002), four reported the findings from randomized control trials (Halbert et al. 2006, 2010; Lerman et al. 1999; Charles et al. 2006) Niclosamide and six reported only baseline data as part of a larger intervention study (Halbert et al. 2005a; Lipkus et al. 1999; Kessler et al. 2005; Hughes et al. 1997; Edwards et al. 2008; Durfy et al. 1999). Two studies used a qualitative approach (Matthews et al. 2000; Ford et al. 2007) involving focus groups with African American women. Table 1 Characteristics of studies incorporating psychosocial predictors of participation in genetic susceptibility counseling and testing for breast cancer in African American women Authors Number (% AfAm women; Number AfAm women) Breast cancer risk criteria Design/methods Measures Findings Armstrong et al.

Comments are closed.