2 ± 30.6–143.5 ± 32.9). The high standard deviation decreases from the point-to-grid towards the adjusted species richness map (Table 1), the standard deviation values for the Andean species richness center notably being the lowest. Table 1 Mean and standard deviation values of angiosperm species richness in the four www.selleckchem.com/products/Romidepsin-FK228.html centers identified in Fig. 3b for original point-to-grid species richness and

for interpolated species richness   No. of quadrats Point-to-grid species richness Fig. 3a Interpolated species richness Fig. 3b Adjusted species Selleckchem Afatinib richness Fig. 3c Central America 60 91.8 ± 56.6 155.7 ± 52.5 136.8 ± 42.2 Andes 100 75.3 ± 33.8 152.7 ± 31.9 121.0 ± 18.0 Amazonia 333 50.7 ± 49.5 158.3 ± 44.0 143.5 ± 32.9 Mata Atlântica 21 75.8 ± 46.1 135.9 ± 33.0 119.2 ± 30.6 Whereas the effect of interpolation on range sizes is shown in Fig. 2f, the effect on point-to-grid species richness is shown in Fig. 4. This effect varies according to the centers of species richness (Fig. 4, ①–④) and to the quadrats not assigned to any of these centers (⑤, ‘unassigned LY2606368 quadrats’). While it

has little effect on the unassigned quadrats ⑤, the interpolation effect is highest for Amazonia ① and the Andes ②. For the smallest center of species richness, the Mata Atlântica ④, the effect is heterogeneous and also the lowest out of the four centers. Fig. 4 Effect of inverse distance-weighted interpolation on the distribution patterns of angiosperm species. ①–④: centers of species richness; ⑤: quadrats not assigned to a center of species richness. Symbols above the dotted equity line indicate that the interpolated species richness variable

L-gulonolactone oxidase of the y-axis outnumbers the point-to-grid species richness of the x-axis. Non-linear regressions (trend lines and shaded standard error envelope) using Generalized Additive Models indicate different effects of interpolation for the different centers The results of the cross validation are high for most quadrats, but the four species richness centers are reflected by slightly higher LOOCV values than the unassigned quadrats (Table 2).The mean robustness per quadrat ranges between 0.777 ± 0.073 and 0.832 ± 0.043, with highest LOOCV values for the Amazonian center of species richness (Table 2). Table 2 Ratio between the species richness estimate by leave-one-out cross-validation (2,549 species) and by weighted interpolation (4,055 species) of the species richness centers identified in Fig. 3b   LOOCV Central America 0.813 ± 0.046 Andes 0.768 ± 0.054 Amazonia 0.833 ± 0.043 Mata Atlântica 0.780 ± 0.070 Unassigned quadrats 0.730 ± 0.