Although needle shadowing occurs frequently to some extent, the tools incorporated in the Vitesse (Varian) software, and in particular the path images tool, allow accurate needle tracking even in cases where a large part of the track is obscured. This image is taken from a phantom, which

click here was implanted with 16 needles. In general, this problem of “needle shadowing” becomes markedly worse as the number of needles in the implant increases. Figure 5 shows the result of registering the US image to the CT image. It is immediately apparent that the bright flashes in the US images do not correspond to the centers of the needles, but rather to the wall of the needle proximal to the US transducer. Because the Vitesse (Varian) software is designed to track the bright flashes, there will be an obvious systematic error in the reconstruction of the implant. If the relationship between the US flash and the needle location as described above is understood, the needle locations can be adjusted accurately in the transverse views. The exact location of each needle tip in the cranial–caudal direction must also be determined if the needle position is to be accurately reconstructed. For needles that are well visualized in the US image, this is not a problem. For needles that are obscured, however, it can be very difficult.

Figure 6 shows the distribution of the displacements (millimeter) of the first dwell positions in the US images from their correct positions as determined from the CT images for all the needles in all buy INCB024360 six phantoms. These displacements were calculated in a cylindrical coordinate system. The radial component is measured radially outward from the probe, the angular component represents a rotation in the transverse plane, and the third component is in the cranial/caudal direction. The systematic error caused by defining else the needle paths along the flash in the US images is again readily apparent. This is evidenced by the fact that the displacement distribution for the radial direction is not centered about zero. Naively, one would expect the displacement to be approximately

equal to the radius of the needles (in our case 1.0 mm). In fact, the average error in this direction was 1.0 mm. The errors in the angular component are distributed relatively evenly about zero, as are the errors in the cranial–caudal direction. These measured displacements are based solely on the Vitesse (Varian) reconstructions of the needle paths. For cases where a needle falls in the shadow of a lower needle, the path reconstruction can be very unreliable. Because the needles all curve to some extent, it is unlikely that one needle will be obscured along its entire length. This usually allows for a reasonably accurate reconstruction of its radial and angular position, at least at a number of points along its length.